Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Vasc Surg ; 76(1): 3-22.e1, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1977597

ABSTRACT

The Society for Vascular Surgery appropriate use criteria (AUC) for the management of intermittent claudication were created using the RAND appropriateness method, a validated and standardized method that combines the best available evidence from medical literature with expert opinion, using a modified Delphi process. These criteria serve as a framework on which individualized patient and clinician shared decision-making can grow. These criteria are not absolute. AUC should not be interpreted as a requirement to administer treatments rated as appropriate (benefit outweighs risk). Nor should AUC be interpreted as a prohibition of treatments rated as inappropriate (risk outweighs benefit). Clinical situations will occur in which moderating factors, not included in these AUC, will shift the appropriateness level of a treatment for an individual patient. Proper implementation of AUC requires a description of those moderating patient factors. For scenarios with an indeterminate rating, clinician judgement combined with the best available evidence should determine the treatment strategy. These scenarios require mechanisms to track the treatment decisions and outcomes. AUC should be revisited periodically to ensure that they remain relevant. The panelists rated 2280 unique scenarios for the treatment of intermittent claudication (IC) in the aortoiliac, common femoral, and femoropopliteal segments in the round 2 rating. Of these, only nine (0.4%) showed a disagreement using the interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry formula, indicating an exceptionally high degree of consensus among the panelists. Post hoc, the term "inappropriate" was replaced with the phrase "risk outweighs benefit." The term "appropriate" was also replaced with "benefit outweighs risk." The key principles for the management of IC reflected within these AUC are as follows. First, exercise therapy is the preferred initial management strategy for all patients with IC. Second, for patients who have not completed exercise therapy, invasive therapy might provide net a benefit for selected patients with IC who are nonsmokers, are taking optimal medical therapy, are considered to have a low physiologic and technical risk, and who are experiencing severe lifestyle limitations and/or a short walking distance. Third, considering the long-term durability of the currently available technology, invasive interventions for femoropopliteal disease should be reserved for patients with severe lifestyle limitations and a short walking distance. Fourth, in the common femoral segment, open common femoral endarterectomy will provide greater net benefit than endovascular intervention for the treatment of IC. Finally, in the infrapopliteal segment, invasive intervention for the treatment of IC is of unclear benefit and could be harmful.


Subject(s)
Intermittent Claudication , Vascular Surgical Procedures , Exercise Therapy/methods , Femoral Artery , Humans , Intermittent Claudication/diagnosis , Intermittent Claudication/surgery , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
2.
Current Nanoscience ; 18(4):465-477, 2022.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1892481

ABSTRACT

Background: Today, SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), a viral disease caused by the novel coronavirus (a tiny crowned virus), has become one of the threats for human beings all over the world and caused the death of millions of people worldwide. Many vaccines have been developed and administered to people in several countries;however, due to their propensity to create new strains, it appears that curing all corona strains will be challenging. So, it is necessary to identify the structure of the virus, mechanism of action, and its antiviral activities against drugs and other functional materials. Methods: AgNPs have unique physicochemical and antimicrobial properties. This review describes the structure and nature of the virus and the mechanism of action of an antiviral drug such as silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) with the virus. In addition, different methods for synthesis of AgNPs, application of AgNPs as an antiviral agent against influenza virus, human immuno deficiency virus (HIV), herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), hepatitis B virus (HBV), polio virus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), are discussed. Also, the most probable applications and properties of AgNPs that can help prepare it as an antiviral agent are discussed. Results: The use of AgNPs against various viruses, including the coronavirus family, is found to be effective;therefore, it can be considered for the development of antiviral agents, disinfectants, antiviral coated mask, and their therapeutic use against the treatment of novel coronavirus with minimum side effect and great efficiency. Conclusion: AgNPs were successfully used for the treatment of various viral diseases of the coronavirus family such as H1N1, H3N2, influenza, even for SARS and MERS coronaviruses. AgNPs coated masks, disinfectants, fabrics, wipes, and inhalation systems are effective for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Since sanitizers have a temporary effect, the development of some other potential alternatives having low toxicity, ease of use, long lasting efficiency, health cautiousness, minimum side effect, sustainable fabrics is required.

4.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(9): e009622, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-744903

ABSTRACT

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has resulted in additional challenges for systems designed to perform expeditious primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. There are 2 important considerations: the guideline-recommended time goals were difficult to achieve for many patients in high-income countries even before the pandemic, and there is a steep increase in mortality when primary percutaneous coronary intervention cannot be delivered in a timely fashion. Although the use of fibrinolytic therapy has progressively decreased over the last several decades in high-income countries, in circumstances when delays in timely delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention are expected, a modern fibrinolytic-based pharmacoinvasive strategy may need to be considered. The purpose of this review is to systematically discuss the contemporary role of an evidence-based fibrinolytic reperfusion strategy as part of a pharmacoinvasive approach, in the context of the emerging coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/drug therapy , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Selection , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , Pneumonia, Viral , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Time Factors
5.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(15): e017175, 2020 08 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-724014

ABSTRACT

Background The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is expected to affect operations and lifestyles of interventional cardiologists around the world in unprecedented ways. Timely gathering of information on this topic can provide valuable insight and improve the handling of the ongoing and future pandemic outbreaks. Methods and Results A survey instrument developed by the authors was disseminated via e-mail, text messaging, WhatsApp, and social media to interventional cardiologists between April 6, 2020, and April 11, 2020. A total of 509 responses were collected from 18 countries, mainly from the United States (51%) and Italy (36%). Operators reported significant decline in coronary, structural heart, and endovascular procedure volumes. Personal protective equipment was available to 95% of respondents; however FIT-tested N95 or equivalent masks were available to only 70%, and 74% indicated absence of coronavirus disease 2019 pretesting. Most (83%) operators expressed concern when asked to perform cardiac catheterization on a suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 patient, primarily because of fear of viral transmission (88%). Although the survey demonstrated significant compliance with social distancing, high use of telemedicine (69%), and online education platforms (80%), there was concern over impending financial loss. Conclusions Our survey indicates significant reduction in invasive procedure volumes and concern for viral transmission. There is near universal adoption of personal protective equipment; however, coronavirus disease 2019 pretesting and access to FIT-tested N95 masks is suboptimal. Although there is concern over impending financial loss, substantial engagement in telemedicine and online education is reported.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19 , Cardiology/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Female , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Personal Protective Equipment , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL